<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Colloquia</title>
 <link>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/45</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Colloquia 31 July 2008: new ways of incentivising clinical performance</title>
 <link>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/135</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In the latest &lt;i&gt;Colloquia&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Health Policy Insight&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; editor Andy Cowper and associate director Tom Smith discuss new ways of incentivising clinicians’ perfomance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;AC: &lt;/b&gt; In the last couple of weeks, I thought one of the most interesting developments was the announcement by Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust that they would introduce pay bonuses for successful operations was worth discussing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/135&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/135#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/45">Colloquia</category>
 <category domain="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/32">Shown in Ticker</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:50:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AndyCowper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">135 at https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Colloquia: markets and choice in healthcare</title>
 <link>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/115</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;AC: &lt;/b&gt;This week, I thought we could discuss markets and market mechanisms in healthcare. Richard Smith has written a good blog for &lt;i&gt;Guardian Online&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/12/nhs?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=uknews&quot; title=&quot;www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/12/nhs?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=uknews&quot;&gt;www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/12/nhs?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=uknews&lt;/a&gt;), which gives a pro-market perspective. That isn&#039;t surprising, given his work with UnitedHealth Europe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;TS: &lt;/b&gt;Sure, but he works for UnitedHealth because he has that perspective, not the other way around.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/115&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/115#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/45">Colloquia</category>
 <category domain="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/32">Shown in Ticker</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:25:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AndyCowper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">115 at https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Colloquia: ministering to clinical priorities, or political ones?</title>
 <link>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/108</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Colloquia: ministering to clinical priorities or political ones?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;In this week’s &lt;i&gt;Colloquia&lt;/i&gt;, Health Policy Insight editor Andy Cowper and associate director Tom Smith discuss how and whether reform is being helped or hindered by the Darzi Review and ongoing BMA-Government rows.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/108&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/108#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/45">Colloquia</category>
 <category domain="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/32">Shown in Ticker</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:49:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AndyCowper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">108 at https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Colloquia: talking about Darzi</title>
 <link>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/80</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Health Policy Insight&lt;/i&gt;’s editor Andy Cowper and associate director Tom Smith discuss whether the Darzi review can  “lead local change from the centre”&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;AC:&lt;/b&gt; So Tom, your latest &lt;a href=&quot;/HPTDarzi&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Health Policy Today&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  suggests that &amp;quot;the publication of the Darzi report, with its focus on local innovation and opportunities for clinicians may be able to move debate on from the current political impasse&amp;quot;. That&#039;s pretty much tantamount to optimism. What makes you optimistic about this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/80&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=node/80#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/45">Colloquia</category>
 <category domain="https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=taxonomy/term/32">Shown in Ticker</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:54:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AndyCowper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">80 at https://test.healthpolicyinsight.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
